This post has nothing to do with the content of this song, only about two words sung in the chorus.
My blog friend Roia once told us: "I have learned over the years to pay attention to the lyrics that pop into my thoughts when I'm with a client. To me they're like messages sent from their consciousness to mine." I've experienced the same - either when I'm with a client or in my personal life. I’ve also experienced the reverse of this too. Sometimes when I listen to music a thought will pop in my head or I’ll see a scene as clearly as if I was watching a movie. This post is about a thought I have when I listen to Lady Gaga's 'Poker Face'. So maybe this is a message sent from my sub-consciousness to my consciousness?Anyway, every time I hear this song I always think of one thing… I don't think I have a good poker face.
We’ve all learned that when working with clients it’s good to have a neutral affect. When a client is showing a behavior that is inappropriate or attention seeking, for example, a facial reaction from the therapist might be reinforcing to that negative behavior. Or, a client may disclose information that the therapist might find emotionally touching on a personal level – maybe feeling surprised, saddened, or angry (to name a few). But showing a strong emotionally charged facial affect could be interpreted by the client as the therapist being judgmental, disapproving, or that their disclosure was ‘wrong’. At the same time, though, there’s nothing incorrect with using facial affect to show the client that the therapist has an understanding of the client’s point of view. As the therapist, having an awareness of your personal feelings and an awareness of your facial affect will help you to be sure that you are expressing what needs to be expressed to support your client.
This neutral affect or, ‘poker face’, is important outside of sessions too. I’m sure we’ve all been in situations where we’re at a meeting and a co-worker makes some off the wall comment causing you to think something like ‘is he/she for real?’ But, you are the boss or in front of your boss and you can’t say that out loud… it would be inappropriate (or possibly reinforcing a negative behavior like I mentioned before, it really depends on the situation). This is a case requiring the poker face.
So how do I work on this?
I consulted my therapy texts and was unable to find ‘how to’ information on displaying a neutral affect. I couldn’t Google myself an answer on this either. The only thing I could find a little bit close to this topic is information on how to be an active listener. I’m sure we all went over this area in class the same way by reading through the chapter on why listening is important, going over the list that defines active listening (eye contact, say ‘uh, huh’, etc.) then working to pairs to practice active listening techniques with our peers. But we didn’t go over the ‘how to’ on neutral affect.
So I started thinking:
What am I really trying to do here? I’m trying to learn how to give a neutral affect when told something.
Who do I know who is good at this whom I could seek counsel from? Other therapists (That’s too obvious, there must be someone else…).
Is there anyone else I know who gives a good affect? Yeah… comedic straight-men.
The skill I’m seeking here has to do with having an awareness and control of my face. Who else does that? Actors. And, who is able to control their face when told surprising information? Comedians.
Take a look at this:
We all know the ageless routine ‘Who’s on First?’ from Abbott and Costello. But really take a look at it. Costello exercises active listening skills – eye contact, head nodding, positive verbalizations – without showing overt emotion. He is listening to Abbott’s questions and answers them factually without showing frustration, annoyance, etc. AND at the same time he maintains a personable affect… he doesn’t look flat or robot-like.
Ok, but this is a rehearsed skit. What about improv comedians? Teachers and students from the LA improv group, The Groundlings, say that improvising is performing without a script and this is something that we all do in lives daily. We go shopping, interact with other people, etc. on our own without being told what to say. Improv comedy is doing the same on the stage with the actor saying what they need to say based on what is given to them in the scene.
Teachers and students from The Groundlings also say that when learning how to improvise the actor must listen and connect with their partner. The actor should be accepting of whatever is given by their partner and should not ask questions of their partner. Doing this places the responsibility of the momentum of the scene on their colleague rather than sharing the responsibility. Instead, the actors should make the scene about each other rather than about themselves.
There seem to be some parallels between improv acting/comedy and therapy situations:
- The therapy session is unscripted and the therapist must work based off of what the client gives them during the session.
- The therapist must listen and connect with the client.
- The therapist should be accepting of their client.
- The therapist should make the session about their client.
Some differences:
- The therapist probably needs to ask questions to get more from the client or to prompt the client to process their thoughts and feelings.
- The therapist should make the session about their client BUT the client should not feel pressure to make the session about the therapist in return.
Maybe the key to keeping a neutral affect has to do with the therapist’s attention. If you (the therapist) are working in the moment, listening to and accepting what your client says, and making the session about them and not your inner-workings… how do you have time to have any kind of emotional reaction that would show up on your face? Of course you would react to what they say by asking questions, creating musical experiences, etc. but those are clinical reactions. The therapist may have feelings of transference. But, if the therapist is able to be in the moment of the session with 100% focus wouldn’t that impede any immediate feelings of transference? The feelings will still be there, but wouldn’t the therapist feel them afterward? This is something I have experienced. The session ends and then when documenting I think: ‘what about this…?’ and ‘wow, that must feel…’, or even ‘that’s similar to when I…’ I didn’t have those thoughts during the session because I was ‘with’ the client. Now that it’s over and I’m processing, this is what is coming out.
Now, what about non-client related situations like meetings? Well, wouldn’t the same ‘complete focus’ technique apply? If I have complete focus on the purpose of the meeting, then I wouldn’t have time to have a feeling of annoyance toward my co-worker who just made a whack-a-do comment.
So maybe the secret of the poker face doesn’t have anything to do with controlling your face or acting a certain way at all. It has to do with really being focused on the purpose of the situation.


